Carex: Important Non-Grass

Pronounced “K-Rex,” this genus of grass-like plant has more than 600 species in North America, 165 in the Rocky Mountain region of the USA. The differences are small and called “insignificant.” About them was once said, “possibly no group of vascular plants is less understood by range ecologists than are the sedges.”

Image of Carex Acutiformis from Wikimedia Commons

Carex Acutiformis, a variety from Europe used to decorate gardens and ponds.

A Dictionary of Plant Sciences, 3rd edition, by Oxford University Press states Carex are also known by the term sedges. They are a genus of rhizomatic perennial herbs. The stems are triangular in cross-section, solid, and leafy. The leaves are linear with a sheathing leaf base. The arrangement of the flowers on the plant varies from a branched panicle to a single spike, and is composed of unisexual flowers, usually clearly separated. The fruit produced is a small nut, which remains within a sac once created. The male flowers have 2 or 3 stamens and are generally held at the top of the flowering arrangement, often in the upper ends of the spikes. The female flowers are restricted to the bottom of the spike. Carex species ar

e found throughout the world, often as components of marshy habitats. There are roughly 1,000 species, of which a limited number are used locally as food or bedding for animals and a few are cultivated as ornamental “grasses” for gardens.

Difficult to identify and very site-specific, those of us working in Rural System see the very precise site requirements for Carex species as an open door to potential plant observations and confirmation, rather than a discovery operation, by finding the multi-factored sites of these frail animal-food sources. Carex species are food sources considered too small and too similar and too site-specific to rank with other species, ¬where farmers (rarely “range managers”) intently study profits from “grassland-like” plants.

The Carex are too easily lumped as “grasses.” I’ve had the pleasure (in approximately 1954) of being taught the diverse characteristics of these grass-like plants. I now think that with improved herbaria of the state and region (USA), new GIS site characterization, and with new imperatives for productive human-food sources from despoiled farm and mined lands of the Virginia rural areas, a meaningful, profitable, site-specific, Carex-forage production system can be created for now and the emerging faunal-future, with domestic and wild-fauna uses.

Image of Carex stricta from Wikimedia Commons

Carex stricta, a variety found throughout the Eastern United States along bodies of water.

I now imagine improved education of staff, learning about the Virginia Carex species with vastly-improved illustrations, naming the plant parts and their seasonal appearance. With education, they can achieve reduced intermixing of “just grass,” site-selection for seeding and care-to-meet-needs, and directed analyses of animal production per unit area of animal forage—invested to meet specific-animal productivity.

We know that the Carex are similar to grasses, were evaluated as being of higher protein value than blue grasses, but were ignored or discounted in the past due to their specific habitat requirements. We hypothesize we can now contest with those specific habitat requirements, with local selections, GIS-based site-selection, and quality-specific uses and results-analyses. “They, these little grasses, are ‘very-site-specific,’” says the range manager. And so are we, within Rural System. We can improve seed-source selection and make very site-specific selections to achieve intensive, cumulative, very-real, net-valued grassland management of Rural System tracts for superior forage. Much of Rural System’s superior forage would be directed at goat systems (having notably high palatability differences among Carex species) for human-youth health gains, as a currently-specific market.

We now see precisely, as if through a macroscope, a way to develop Carex centers throughout Virginia’s rural lands, create a high-quality forage specialty with great sales appeal, and work with a regional Carex organization, formed to bring raw botanical complexity and unique applications and developments on managed rural lands, to bear profitable, lasting, diverse gains for people. A staff can be built readily, within PowerPlace of Rural System, to develop a new resource under-foot for region-wide use and development… just some old non-grass patches!

For the future, food scarcity and crop growth will become an increasing concern. Feeding livestock with alternates to standard grasses, especially those higher in nutrient density that take up fewer resources per square acre to grow, will become a primary solution. If we are to keep meat on the menu, we have to invest in these plans sooner rather than later.

———

Rural Future: An Alternative for Society Before 2050 AD describes one system, Rural System, designed to meet the many interconnected rural problems in America, and ultimately worldwide. Visit the book page to download the full manuscript or individual chapters in .pdf format. Subscribe to the Rural System blog to receive more supplements to Rural Future on a variety of topics relating to the future of superior rural land management.

This is a supplement to Rural Future. Find other supplements in the Rural Futures Supplements category.

References:

Allaby, M. (Ed.). ( 2012). A Dictionary of Plant Sciences (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

F.J. Hermann, 19760, 65, 68, Notes on Rocky Mt. Carices. Rhodora 70. 419-421.

Lewis, M.E. 1958. Carex- its distribution and importance in Utah. Brigham Young Univ., Sci. Bull. Biological Ser. I, No.2. Provo, Utah. 43 sp.

Save

Save

Save

Save

Unwasted: The Knowledge Resource

I learned richly from “outdoor books” and still do. Sensing that others do not—and that they may disrespect the content of my collection of books, books that led me through “scouting,” into interesting paths and topics within the university, world travel, and now to quaint remembrances. I am troubled by the probable loss of my books and the riches they may provide among novel, untested, and seemingly irrelevant topics of the day. I am still looking for a new home for them.

The imagined “save” from the waste-paper box gives me some pleasure as I imagine some of my books read with enthusiasm, as if I might be talking to my grandchildren and those who might be building toward love of the land and its wild flora and fauna and special places. View from the Blue Ridge Parkway

Among my treasures, especially the family gifts, are:

  • Fun with Bow and Arrow a booklet by the Bear Archery Company, 1953 (No Online Copy Available)
  • The Natural History of Deer by Rory Putnam, 1988 (As seen here)
  • The Book of Woodcraft by Ernest Thompson Seton, 1922 (As seen here)
  • Wild Animals at Home by Ernest Thompson Seton, 1913 (No Online Copy Available)
  • The Grizzly Bear by Thomas McNamee, 1982 (As seen here)
  • Camping and Woodcraft by Horace Kephart, 1972 (As seen here)
  • Scout Field Book by James E. West and William Hillcourt, 1948 (As seen here)
  • Woodcraft by George W. Sears, 1920 (As seen here)
  • Scouting for Boys by Robert Baden-Powell, 1946 (No Online Copy Available)
  • Fieldbook of Natural History  by E. Laurence Palmer 1949 (As seen here)

With gifts from Professor A.B. Massey (botanical) and Prof. Henry S. Mosby (the lesson of the extensive “reprint collection,” now threatened), knowledge is often poorly saved, inadequately used, rarely synthesized, cores rarely reached, joy of unifications rarely experienced, or another “annual,” leading to a future like the past.

I learn now from Palmer’s “ancient” work (listed above)—a pattern for the future with new illustrations and expanded text—to make each observation and provide for its expansion. There are so many potentials! Many are likely to be useful (or harmful, as indicated within each text entry) in several ways now known (and positioned for feedback as needed). Old books, while out of print and sometimes out of practice, still hold knowledge and inspiration worth reading for. I’ll look for those readers who believe the same.

 

———

Rural Future: An Alternative for Society Before 2050 AD describes one system, Rural System, designed to meet the many interconnected rural problems in America, and ultimately worldwide. Visit the book page to download the full manuscript or individual chapters in .pdf format. Subscribe to the Rural System blog to receive more supplements to Rural Future on a variety of topics relating to the future of superior rural land management.

This is a supplement to Rural Future. Find other supplements in the Rural Futures Supplements category.

Save

Save

Seeing’s Believing? Deer Eye Lenses Estimate Age

My loss of high-quality personal sight saddens my imagined relations with the citizen nature-lover, as well as the rural-land-owner concentrating on modern fauna in nature. The wildlife manager, as well as many hunters, may want greater deer harvest for several reasons, and will turn to understanding the population that is desired, probably their number and their dynamics.

“More deer” may sound like an objective heard or sensed from the public. However, the modern manager will be thinking of deer population ages, population structure, and answering: “what system will yield, and continue to yield, legally-harvested deer?” Deer ages are needed for answering this question, and getting them for a large population of healthy, wild deer is the ongoing task of the rural land manager.

Biologists have learned that deer, as many other mammals, have eye lenses that continue to grow in size as they age. Lens weights correlate well with deer age; the lens grows consistently, precious for individual survival. Deer eyes, or a sample, may be removed from dead deer at roadside checking stations (having no effect on “trophies”).

Wildlife biologists can use the association of increasing eye-lens weight to estimate deer age. Properly preserved and processed, deer eye lenses, sampled from all deer taken by hunters from a region, produce the data needed for computer procedures to estimate herd dynamics, the results of combinations of natural forces, poaching, food supplies, hunters, season lengths, changes in hunter groups, and future deer populations.

Beaver eye lenses

Photo of beaver eyes lenses from Dr. Giles’s private collection.

Similar survival growth is found in other animals. I’ve seen large samples of properly-preserved beaver eye lenses, clear messages of major studies of wild beaver population dynamics in a large Idaho watershed. Single, large watershed studies provide essential management data, descriptive of the population status, changes, and therefore the future financial resources of land owners. (As described in Chapter 9 of Rural Future, well-managed wild populations of beavers over time contributes to lasting, profitable wild-fur production and tourists’ viewing, among other enterprises.)

For some organisms, as deer, body size and weight tell stories for superior management; for other organisms, well-studied organs provide status and flow for future populations, and their roles in resource production, tourism, hunting, and commercial trapping, within lasting, dynamic, managed systems, fine-tuned to markets, watershed management, local land and water needs, and mysteriously changing human rural population preferences and curiosities.

Rural Future: An Alternative for Society Before 2050 AD describes one system, Rural System, designed to meet the many interconnected rural problems in America, and ultimately worldwide. Visit the book page to download the full manuscript or individual chapters in .pdf format. Subscribe to the Rural System blog to receive more supplements to Rural Future on a variety of topics relating to the future of superior rural land management.

This is a supplement to Rural Future. Find other supplements in the Rural Futures Supplements category.